india-castle-hero.png

What “Value Up”?!

Due to my differing view on leadership accountability and succession planning, I will be resigning from the Board effective June 3rd, 2024.

 

We review board and management changes within our universe of companies on a weekly basis and, when it comes to justifications, most are inevitably “due to personal reasons”. So when we saw the above reason, stated by Nisa Godrej after resigning from the board of a luggage manufacturer in India, we were pleasantly surprised with the candour. However, one only needs to read Nisa’s letters in Godrej Consumer’s annual reports to see that she is perhaps one of the most transparent corporate leaders in India. One wouldn’t expect anything less from her.

That aside, most independent directors typically give ambiguous reasons for their resignation, leaving minority shareholders in the dark about the real issues. The Indian stock market regulator, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), has changed that by requiring more detailed disclosures on the resignations of key personnel (in addition to making their resignation letters public). Going forward, if a director resigns due to “personal reasons”, he or she would be questioned about continuing to serve on other boards and may even be disallowed from joining a new board for at least a year, which is quite a deterrent. 

Still, most corporate resignations will continue to be run-of-the-mill humdrum affairs. But every now and then, shareholders get glimpses of the politics that govern board dynamics in public companies. This is often a marker of corporate culture, which is in itself a key determinant of the long-term performance of any business, in our view. No other emerging market, to our knowledge, is pushing for this level of disclosure.

Indeed, this is a consistent theme. One can always find shortcomings, but broadly speaking and relative to the stage of its economic development, India’s financial system is ahead when it comes to protecting the interests of individuals, be they stock market investors, depositors, borrowers or buyers of insurance policies. For instance, the Reserve Bank of India (India’s central bank and regulator), recently began clamping down on small-ticket unsecured loans1. Typically, by the time we see such actions in other emerging markets, non-performing loans (NPLs) in the system are already surging and the banking system is in need of a bailout. In this case, there are no such issues. NPL ratios in India are at decadal lows. But the regulator had spotted errant activity that, if not nipped in the bud, could have potentially hurt the system and individual borrowers.

Similarly, the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority recently directed life insurance companies to provide reasonable payouts to customers if they wished to surrender a policy before reaching the minimum investment period specified in their contracts2. At present, policyholders get nothing, or receive just a paltry payout, if they discontinue their premiums. This forms a significant chunk of the profits for most Indian life insurance companies, and indeed, many global peers as well. The insurance industry is notorious for being run for the profiteering agents and companies – nobody has ever lobbied for the consumer. The regulator in India intends to pick up the consumer from the back of the queue and place her right up front. Whilst there are perhaps nuances to this which we do not fully comprehend, the intent seems right – and we rarely see this happening in other jurisdictions.

Whether it is disclosures and rules around tag-along rights, board independence, share pledges or even environmental, social and governance (ESG) data, we consistently find ourselves pleasantly surprised by events in India. It is also encouraging to see shareholders take advantage of the protections afforded to them. For example, when Nestle India’s parent company recently proposed increasing the royalty charge from 4.5% to 5.25%, the proposal had to be voted upon by minority shareholders. 57% voted against the move, thereby directly impacting the company’s future bottom line3. And another recent instance of regulators taking a stand was when minority shareholders rejected a proposal by Linde India which severely limited the company’s scope of operations, instead favouring those of Praxair India, given that Linde and Praxair had merged globally. Upon receiving investor complaints that Linde India was effectively disregarding the result of the minority shareholder vote, SEBI appointed an independent valuer to ascertain the appropriateness of related-party transactions between Linde India and Praxair India, ensuring that minority interests were protected4.

We often read about investors getting excited about a “Value Up” program in Korea, or similar in Japan, or second-guessing what the regulators might do in China to propel the stock markets there. At the same time, we are constantly asked about the valuations in India for good businesses which are run by good people, who are conscious of return on capital employed and good governance, and are overseen by regulators who are getting better at doing the right thing for all stakeholders. Near-term valuations aside, we find the notion of clubbing India with some other bigger markets in the region and comparing them in same breath sometimes frustrating and often amusing. This is not to say we are oblivious to reality – India’s market capitalisation to Gross Domestic Product (GDP), anecdotally a good measure of broad valuations, is at a decadal high of 150%5. Specifically, we notice that valuations of many small and mid-cap companies, and particularly in certain sectors, are questionably high.  But as always, we are being prudent; and we are confident in preserving our clients’ capital during tough periods and growing it steadily over the long term.

In conclusion, we all face a choice when it comes to investing in India and the answer depends on our views. Do protections for all stakeholders deserve a premium? Does a higher awareness for capital deserve a premium? Do enterprises which have their long-term destiny in their own hands deserve a premium? Does a country with a young, educated and aspiring population, urbanising at a fast pace, deserve a premium? Does a market where democracy won yet again deserve a premium? You decide…

 

Source: Company data retrieved from company annual reports or other such investor reports. Financial metrics and valuations are from FactSet and Bloomberg. As at 23 January 2024 or otherwise noted.

Footnotes

1 RBI clamps down on unsecured credit

2 IRDAI’s new policy surrender value rule: How will it impact life insurance policyholders?

3 Glass Lewis Proxy Voting Advisors

4 Interim Order in the matter of Linde India Ltd.

5 World Bank DataBank: GDP (current USD) – India, 2023; and BSE Ltd, as at 11 July 2024

Important information

References to “we” or “us” are references to First Sentier Investors (FSI). The FSSA Investment Managers business forms part of First Sentier Investors, which is a global asset management business that is ultimately owned by Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc (MUFG), a global financial group. 

In Hong Kong, this document is issued by First Sentier Investors (Hong Kong) Limited (FSI HK) and has not been reviewed by the Securities & Futures Commission in Hong Kong. In Singapore, this document is issued by First Sentier Investors (Singapore) (FSIS) whose company registration number is 196900420D.  This advertisement or publication has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.   In Australia, this information has been prepared and issued by First Sentier Investors (Australia) IM Ltd (ABN 89 114 194 311, AFSL 289017) (FSI AIM).

This document is directed at persons who are professional, sophisticated or wholesale clients and has not been prepared for and is not intended for persons who are retail clients. The information herein is for information purposes only. It is not intended to provide you with financial product advice and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Before making an investment decision you should consider, with a financial advisor, whether this information is appropriate in light of your investment needs, objectives and financial situation. Some of the funds mentioned herein are not authorised for offer/sale to the public in certain jurisdiction. Reference to specific securities (if any) is included for the purpose of illustration only and should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell the same. All securities mentioned herein may or may not form part of the holdings of First Sentier Investors’ portfolios at a certain point in time, and the holdings may change over time. 

Any opinions expressed in this material are the opinions of the individual authors at the time of publication only and are subject to change without notice. Such opinions: (i) are not a recommendation to hold, purchase or sell a particular financial product; (ii) may not include all of the information needed to make an investment decision in relation to such a financial product; and (iii) may substantially differ from other individuals within First Sentier Investors. 

Please refer to the relevant offering documents in relation to any funds mentioned in this material for details, including the risk factors and information on requirements relating to investor eligibility before making a decision about investing in such funds. The offering document is available from First Sentier Investors and FSI on its website and should be considered before any investment decision in relation to any such funds.

Neither MUFG, FSI HK, FSIS, FSI AIM nor any of affiliates thereof guarantee the performance of any investment or entity referred to in this document or the repayment of capital. Any investment in funds referred to herein are not deposits or other liabilities of MUFG, FSI HK, FSIS, FSI or affiliates thereof and are subject to investment risk, including loss of income and capital invested. 

We have taken reasonable care to ensure that this material is accurate, current, and complete and fit for its intended purpose and audience as at the date of publication. No assurance is given or liability accepted regarding the accuracy, validity or completeness of this material and we do not undertake to update it in future if circumstances change. No part of this material may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written consent of FSI.

Any performance information has been calculated using exit prices after taking into account all ongoing fees and assuming reinvestment of distributions, unless otherwise noted. No allowance has been made for taxation. Past performance is not indicative of future performance.

Copyright © First Sentier Investors (Australia) Services Pty Limited 2024 

All rights reserved.